1 commit e4bfad3a3c51054df7e537a724c8d0bf9be972ff (tag: refs/tags/v0.94.1, refs/remotes/gh/hammer)
2 Author: Jenkins <jenkins@inktank.com>
3 Date: Fri Apr 10 12:04:50 2015 -0700
7 commit 733864738fa93979727e480e403293e079bb51e9
9 Author: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
10 Date: Fri Apr 10 17:51:38 2015 +0200
12 Merge pull request #4328 from dachary/wip-11364-hammer
14 v4 bucket feature detection
16 Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
18 commit 5ca771a7d1df8e78ee503a7063068cf744d5efcc
19 Author: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
20 Date: Fri Apr 10 08:43:45 2015 -0700
22 crush: fix has_v4_buckets()
26 This bug made us incorrectly think we were using v4 features when user type
27 5 was being used. That's currently 'rack' with recent crush maps, but
28 was other types for clusters that were created with older versions. This
29 is clearly problematic as it will lock out non-hammer clients incorrectly,
30 breaking deployments on upgrade.
34 Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
35 (cherry picked from commit 38b35ab9d17eb84ac178c4cd3ebcf2ec0f66d8b6)
37 commit 33e79ab7aa0b5428e8fb82a90eea17d31d363a88
38 Author: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
39 Date: Thu Apr 9 17:17:59 2015 -0700
41 crush: fix dump of has_v4_buckets
44 Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
45 (cherry picked from commit d6e23413017fb8f5d7f18d74e993ceeedb82d8bc)
47 commit b5921d55d16796e12d66ad2c4add7305f9ce2353
48 Author: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
49 Date: Thu Apr 9 14:42:34 2015 -0700
51 crush/mapper: fix divide-by-0 in straw2
53 If the item weight is 0 we don't want to divide; instead draw a minimal
57 Reported-by: Yann Dupont <yd@objoo.org>
58 Tested-by: Yann Dupont <yd@objoo.org>
59 Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
60 (cherry picked from commit 64d1e900ec4f5831972ec80e8d0129604669f5bb)
62 commit 93c8f436a4f84ac8088e1a1de82350dd33c68d64
63 Author: Guang Yang <yguang@yahoo-inc.com>
64 Date: Thu Feb 26 08:13:12 2015 +0000
66 osd: fix negative degraded objects during backfilling
68 When there is deleting requests during backfilling, the reported number of degraded
69 objects could be negative, as the primary's num_objects is the latest (locally) but
70 the number for replicas might not reflect the deletings. A simple fix is to ignore
71 the negative subtracted value.
73 Signed-off-by: Guang Yang <yguang@yahoo-inc.com>
74 (cherry picked from commit 14d7e36d3c978844da73d0e1c8a3a1ec863bac15)