test_spec: Need deployment scenario in RFC2889 Forwarding Rate test

The RFC 2889 Forwarding Rate test requires a Deployment Scenario
Section - was missing.

JIRA: VSPERF-102

Change-Id: Iaf661a6bbb9ad52f23147f9444f23d96a82ceb2d
Signed-off-by: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
Reviewed-by: Maryam Tahhan <maryam.tahhan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Billy O'Mahony<billy.o.mahony@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gene Snider <eugene.snider@huawei.com>

diff --git a/docs/to-be-reorganized/vswitchperf_ltd.rst b/docs/to-be-reorganized/vswitchperf_ltd.rst
index 33162bf..3ffd23e 100755 (executable)
--- a/docs/to-be-reorganized/vswitchperf_ltd.rst
+++ b/docs/to-be-reorganized/vswitchperf_ltd.rst
@@ -1468,6 +1468,14 @@ Test ID: LTD.Throughput.RFC2889.MaxForwardingRate
     -  CPU and memory utilization may also be collected as part of this
        test, to determine the vSwitch's performance footprint on the system.
 
+    **Deployment scenario**:
+
+    -  Physical → virtual switch → physical. Note: Full mesh tests with
+       multiple ingress and egress ports are a key aspect of RFC 2889
+       benchmarks, and scenarios with both 2 and 4 ports should be tested.
+       In any case, the number of ports used must be reported.
+
+
 Test ID: LTD.Throughput.RFC2889.ForwardPressure
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     **Title**: RFC2889 Forward Pressure Test