X-Git-Url: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/gitweb?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fceph%2Fdoc%2Fdev%2Fsession_authentication.rst;fp=src%2Fceph%2Fdoc%2Fdev%2Fsession_authentication.rst;h=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000;hb=7da45d65be36d36b880cc55c5036e96c24b53f00;hp=e8a5059c69e39e4dcad986436c36b17cd13a499b;hpb=691462d09d0987b47e112d6ee8740375df3c51b2;p=stor4nfv.git diff --git a/src/ceph/doc/dev/session_authentication.rst b/src/ceph/doc/dev/session_authentication.rst deleted file mode 100644 index e8a5059..0000000 --- a/src/ceph/doc/dev/session_authentication.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,160 +0,0 @@ -============================================== -Session Authentication for the Cephx Protocol -============================================== -Peter Reiher -7/30/12 - -The original Cephx protocol authenticated the client to the authenticator and set up a session -key used to authenticate the client to the server it needs to talk to. It did not, however, -authenticate the ongoing messages between the client and server. Based on the fact that they -share a secret key, these ongoing session messages can be easily authenticated by using the -key to sign the messages. - -This document describes changes to the code that allow such ongoing session authentication. -The changes allow for future changes that permit other authentication protocols (and the -existing null NONE and UNKNOWN protocols) to handle signatures, but the only protocol that -actually does signatures, at the time of the writing, is the Cephx protocol. - -Introduction -------------- - -This code comes into play after the Cephx protocol has completed. At this point, the client and -server share a secret key. This key will be used for authentication. For other protocols, there -may or may not be such a key in place, and perhaps the actual procedures used to perform -signing will be different, so the code is written to be general. - -The "session" here is represented by an established pipe. For such pipes, there should be a -``session\_security`` structure attached to the pipe. Whenever a message is to be sent on the -pipe, code that handles the signature for this kind of session security will be called. On the -other end of the pipe, code that checks this kind of session security's message signatures will -be called. Messages that fail the signature check will not be processed further. That implies -that the sender had better be in agreement with the receiver on the session security being used, -since otherwise messages will be uniformly dropped between them. - -The code is also prepared to handle encryption and decryption of session messages, which would -add secrecy to the integrity provided by the signatures. No protocol currently implemented -encrypts the ongoing session messages, though. - -For this functionality to work, several steps are required. First, the sender and receiver must have -a successful run of the cephx protocol to establish a shared key. They must store that key somewhere -that the pipe can get at later, to permit messages to be signed with it. Sent messages must be -signed, and received messages must have their signatures checked. - -The signature could be computed in a variety of ways, but currently its size is limited to 64 bits. -A message's signature is placed in its footer, in a field called ``sig``. - -The signature code in Cephx can be turned on and off at runtime, using a Ceph boolean option called -``cephx\_sign\_messages``. It is currently set to false, by default, so no messages will be signed. It -must be changed to true to cause signatures to be calculated and checked. - -Storing the Key ---------------- - -The key is needed to create signatures on the sending end and check signatures on the receiving end. -In the future, if asymmetric crypto is an option, it's possible that two keys (a private one for -this end of the pipe and a public one for the other end) would need to be stored. At this time, -messages going in both directions will be signed with the same key, so only that key needs to be -saved. - -The key is saved when the pipe is established. On the client side, this happens in ``connect()``, -which is located in ``msg/Pipe.cc``. The key is obtained from a run of the Cephx protocol, -which results in a successfully checked authorizer structure. If there is such an authorizer -available, the code calls ``get\_auth\_session\_handler()`` to create a new authentication session handler -and stores it in the pipe data structure. On the server side, a similar thing is done in -``accept()`` after the authorizer provided by the client has been verified. - -Once these things are done on either end of the connection, session authentication can start. - -These routines (``connect()`` and ``accept()``) are also used to handle situations where a new -session is being set up. At this stage, no authorizer has been created yet, so there's no key. -Special cases in the code that calls the signature code skip these calls when the -``CEPH\_AUTH\_UNKNOWN`` protocol is in use. This protocol label is on the pre-authorizer -messages in a session, indicating that negotiation on an authentication protocol is ongoing and -thus signature is not possible. There will be a reliable authentication operation later in this -session before anything sensitive should be passed, so this is not a security problem. - -Signing Messages ----------------- - -Messages are signed in the ``write\_message`` call located in ``msg/Pipe.cc``. The actual -signature process is to encrypt the CRCs for the message using the shared key. Thus, we must -defer signing until all CRCs have been computed. The header CRC is computed last, so we -call ``sign\_message()`` as soon as we've calculated that CRC. - -``sign\_message()`` is a virtual function defined in ``auth/AuthSessionHandler.h``. Thus, -a specific version of it must be written for each authentication protocol supported. Currently, -only UNKNOWN, NONE and CEPHX are supported. So there is a separate version of ``sign\_message()`` in -``auth/unknown/AuthUnknownSessionHandler.h``, ``auth/none/AuthNoneSessionHandler.h`` and -``auth/cephx/CephxSessionHandler.cc``. The UNKNOWN and NONE versions simply return 0, indicating -success. - -The CEPHX version is more extensive. It is found in ``auth/cephx/CephxSessionHandler.cc``. -The first thing done is to determine if the run time option to handle signatures (see above) is on. -If not, the Cephx version of ``sign\_message()`` simply returns success without actually calculating -a signature or inserting it into the message. - -If the run time option is enabled, ``sign\_message()`` copies all of the message's CRCs (one from the -header and three from the footer) into a buffer. It calls ``encode\_encrypt()`` on the buffer, -using the key obtained from the pipe's ``session\_security`` structure. 64 bits of the encrypted -result are put into the message footer's signature field and a footer flag is set to indicate that -the message was signed. (This flag is a sanity check. It is not regarded as definitive -evidence that the message was signed. The presence of a ``session\_security`` structure at the -receiving end requires a signature regardless of the value of this flag.) If this all goes well, -``sign\_message()`` returns 0. If there is a problem anywhere along the line and no signature -was computed, it returns ``SESSION\_SIGNATURE\_FAILURE``. - -Checking Signatures -------------------- - -The signature is checked by a routine called ``check\_message\_signature()``. This is also a -virtual function, defined in ``auth/AuthSessionHandler.h``. So again there are specific versions -for supported authentication protocols, such as UNKNOWN, NONE and CEPHX. Again, the UNKNOWN and -NONE versions are stored in ``auth/unknown/AuthUnknownSessionHandler.h`` and -``auth/none/AuthNoneSessionHandler.h``, respectively, and again they simply return 0, indicating -success. - -The CEPHX version of ``check\_message\_signature()`` performs a real signature check. This routine -(stored in ``auth/cephx/CephxSessionHandler.cc``) exits with success if the run time option has -disabled signatures. Otherwise, it takes the CRCs from the header and footer, encrypts the result, -and compares it to the signature stored in the footer. Since an earlier routine has checked that -the CRCs actually match the contents of the message, it is unnecessary to recompute the CRCs -on the raw data in the message. The encryption is performed with the same ``encode\_encrypt()`` -routine used on the sending end, using the key stored in the local ``session\_security`` -data structure. - -If everything checks out, the CEPHX routine returns 0, indicating succcess. If there is a -problem, the routine returns ``SESSION\_SIGNATURE\_FAILURE``. - -Adding New Session Authentication Methods ------------------------------------------ - -For the purpose of session authentication only (not the basic authentication of client and -server currently performed by the Cephx protocol), in addition to adding a new protocol, that -protocol must have a ``sign\_message()`` routine and a ``check\_message\_signature`` routine. -These routines will take a message pointer as a parameter and return 0 on success. The procedure -used to sign and check will be specific to the new method, but probably there will be a -``session\_security`` structure attached to the pipe that contains a cryptographic key. This -structure will be either an ``AuthSessionHandler`` (found in ``auth/AuthSessionHandler.h``) -or a structure derived from that type. - -Adding Encryption to Sessions ------------------------------ - -The existing code is partially, but not fully, set up to allow sessions to have their packets -encrypted. Part of adding encryption would be similar to adding a new authentication method. -But one would also need to add calls to the encryption and decryption routines in ``write\_message()`` -and ``read\_message()``. These calls would probably go near where the current calls for -authentication are made. You should consider whether you want to replace the existing calls -with something more general that does whatever the chosen form of session security requires, -rather than explicitly saying ``sign`` or ``encrypt``. - -Session Security Statistics ---------------------------- - -The existing Cephx authentication code keeps statistics on how many messages were signed, how -many message signature were checked, and how many checks succeeded and failed. It is prepared -to keep similar statistics on encryption and decryption. These statistics can be accessed through -the call ``printAuthSessionHandlerStats`` in ``auth/AuthSessionHandler.cc``. - -If new authentication or encryption methods are added, they should include code that keeps these -statistics.