virtualized resource is determined by referring to the mapping of physical and
virtualized resources.
-The relation from physical resources to virtualized resources shall be
-configurable, as the cause of unavailability of virtualized resources can be
-different in technologies and policies of deployment.
+VIM shall allow configuration of fault correlation between physical and
+virtual resources. VIM shall support correlating faults:
+
+* between a physical resource and another physical resource
+* between a physical resource and a virtual resource
+* between a virtual resource and another virtual resource
Failure aggregation is also required in this feature, e.g., a user may request
to be only notified if failures on more than two standby VMs in an (N+M)
messaging model is better suited for these notifications, as notifications are
only sent to subscribed consumers.
-Note: the VIM should only accept individual notification URLs for each resource
-by its owner or administrator.
+Notifications will be send out along with the configuration by the consumer.
+The configuration includes endpoint(s) in which the consumers can specify
+multiple targets for the notification subscription, so that various and
+multiple receiver functions can consume the notification message.
+Also, the conditions for notifications shall be configurable, such that
+the consumer can set according policies, e.g. whether it wants to receive
+fault notifications or not.
+Note: the VIM should only accept notification subscriptions for each resource
+by its owner or administrator.
Notifications to the Consumer about the unavailability of virtualized
resources will include a description of the fault, preferably with sufficient
-abstraction rather than detailed physical fault information. Flexibility in
-notifications is important. For example, the receiver function in the
-consumer-side implementation could have different schema, location, and policies
-(e.g. receive or not, aggregate events with the same cause, etc.).
+abstraction rather than detailed physical fault information.
.. _fencing:
Recovery Action
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-In the basic "Fault management using ACT-STBY configuration" use case, no
-automatic actions will be taken by the VIM, but all recovery actions executed by
-the VIM and the NFVI will be instructed and coordinated by the Consumer.
+In the basic :ref:`uc-fault1` use case, no automatic actions will be taken by
+the VIM, but all recovery actions executed by the VIM and the NFVI will be
+instructed and coordinated by the Consumer.
In a more advanced use case, the VIM shall be able to recover the failed virtual
resources according to a pre-defined behavior for that resource. In principle