Add test case description for TC028-kvm
[yardstick.git] / docs / yardstick / opnfv_yardstick_tc019.rst
1 *************************************
2 Yardstick Test Case Description TC019
3 *************************************
4
5 +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
6 |Control Node Openstack Service High Availability                             |
7 |                                                                             |
8 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
9 |test case id  | OPNFV_YARDSTICK_TC019_HA: Control node Openstack service down|
10 |              |                                                              |
11 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
12 |test purpose  | This test case will verify the high availability of the      |
13 |              | service provided by OpenStack (like nova-api, neutro-server) |
14 |              | on control node.                                             |
15 |              |                                                              |
16 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
17 |test method   | This test case kills the processes of a specific Openstack   |
18 |              | service on a selected control node, then checks whether the  |
19 |              | request of the related Openstack command is OK and the killed|
20 |              | processes are recovered.                                     |
21 |              |                                                              |
22 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
23 |attackers     | In this test case, an attacker called "kill-process" is      |
24 |              | needed. This attacker includes three parameters:             |
25 |              | 1) fault_type: which is used for finding the attacker's      |
26 |              | scripts. It should be always set to "kill-process" in this   |
27 |              | test case.                                                   |
28 |              | 2) process_name: which is the process name of the specified  |
29 |              | OpenStack service. If there are multiple processes use the   |
30 |              | same name on the host, all of them are killed by this        |
31 |              | attacker.                                                    |
32 |              | 3) host: which is the name of a control node being attacked. |
33 |              |                                                              |
34 |              | e.g.                                                         |
35 |              | -fault_type: "kill-process"                                  |
36 |              | -process_name: "nova-api"                                    |
37 |              | -host: node1                                                 |
38 |              |                                                              |
39 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
40 |monitors      | In this test case, two kinds of monitor are needed:          |
41 |              | 1. the "openstack-cmd" monitor constantly request a specific |
42 |              |    Openstack command, which needs two parameters:            |
43 |              | 1) monitor_type: which is used for finding the monitor class |
44 |              | and related scritps. It should be always set to              |
45 |              | "openstack-cmd" for this monitor.                            |
46 |              | 2) command_name: which is the command name used for request  |
47 |              |                                                              |
48 |              | 2. the "process" monitor check whether a process is running  |
49 |              |    on a specific node, which needs three parameters:         |
50 |              | 1) monitor_type: which used for finding the monitor class and|
51 |              | related scritps. It should be always set to "process"        |
52 |              | for this monitor.                                            |
53 |              | 2) process_name: which is the process name for monitor       |
54 |              | 3) host: which is the name of the node runing the process    |
55 |              |                                                              |
56 |              | e.g.                                                         |
57 |              | monitor1:                                                    |
58 |              | -monitor_type: "openstack-cmd"                               |
59 |              | -command_name: "nova image-list"                             |
60 |              | monitor2:                                                    |
61 |              | -monitor_type: "process"                                     |
62 |              | -process_name: "nova-api"                                    |
63 |              | -host: node1                                                 |
64 |              |                                                              |
65 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
66 |metrics       | In this test case, there are two metrics:                    |
67 |              | 1)service_outage_time: which indicates the maximum outage    |
68 |              | time (seconds) of the specified Openstack command request.   |
69 |              | 2)process_recover_time: which indicates the maximun time     |
70 |              | (seconds) from the process being killed to recovered         |
71 |              |                                                              |
72 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
73 |test tool     | Developed by the project. Please see folder:                 |
74 |              | "yardstick/benchmark/scenarios/availability/ha_tools"        |
75 |              |                                                              |
76 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
77 |references    | ETSI NFV REL001                                              |
78 |              |                                                              |
79 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
80 |configuration | This test case needs two configuration files:                |
81 |              | 1) test case file: opnfv_yardstick_tc019.yaml                |
82 |              | -Attackers: see above "attackers" discription                |
83 |              | -waiting_time: which is the time (seconds) from the process  |
84 |              | being killed to stoping monitors the monitors                |
85 |              | -Monitors: see above "monitors" discription                  |
86 |              | -SLA: see above "metrics" discription                        |
87 |              |                                                              |
88 |              | 2)POD file: pod.yaml                                         |
89 |              | The POD configuration should record on pod.yaml first.       |
90 |              | the "host" item in this test case will use the node name in  |
91 |              | the pod.yaml.                                                |
92 |              |                                                              |
93 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
94 |test sequence | description and expected result                              |
95 |              |                                                              |
96 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
97 |step 1        | start monitors:                                              |
98 |              | each monitor will run with independently process             |
99 |              |                                                              |
100 |              | Result: The monitor info will be collected.                  |
101 |              |                                                              |
102 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
103 |step 2        | do attacker: connect the host through SSH, and then execute  |
104 |              | the kill process script with param value specified by        |
105 |              | "process_name"                                               |
106 |              |                                                              |
107 |              | Result: Process will be killed.                              |
108 |              |                                                              |
109 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
110 |step 3        | stop monitors after a period of time specified by            |
111 |              | "waiting_time"                                               |
112 |              |                                                              |
113 |              | Result: The monitor info will be aggregated.                 |
114 |              |                                                              |
115 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
116 |step 4        | verify the SLA                                               |
117 |              |                                                              |
118 |              | Result: The test case is passed or not.                      |
119 |              |                                                              |
120 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
121 |post-action   | It is the action when the test cases exist. It will check the|
122 |              | status of the specified process on the host, and restart the |
123 |              | process if it is not running for next test cases             |
124 |              |                                                              |
125 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
126 |test verdict  | Fails only if SLA is not passed, or if there is a test case  |
127 |              | execution problem.                                           |
128 |              |                                                              |
129 +--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+